Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)
Also known as: ACDF (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion), Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion, Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, Cervical anterior discectomy and fusion, Anterior cervical decompression and fusion, Cervical discectomy and fusion, Neck disc removal and fusion surgery, Anterior cervical fusion surgery
Last updated: December 18, 2024
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is a surgery that removes damaged disc material in the neck through a front-of-neck approach and stabilizes the spine with a fusion. It may be considered for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy from herniated discs or degenerative changes when symptoms persist or neurologic impairment is present. It can reduce arm pain and improve nerve function; risks include swallowing difficulty.
Key Facts
- •Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) be used to relieve symptoms from a damaged cervical disc by removing disc material and stabilizing the spine with a fusion
- •Indicated for persistent pain and functional limitation that continues despite non-surgical treatment
- •Performed arthroscopically under anesthesia, using a tissue graft to restore function
- •Recovery involves physical therapy over weeks to months, with gradual return to activities
Overview
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) may be used to relieve symptoms from a damaged cervical disc by removing disc material and stabilizing the spine with a fusion. It can be considered for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy related to herniated discs or degenerative changes when symptoms persist despite non-surgical care or when neurologic impairment is present. The procedure typically involves an anterior (front-of-neck) approach, decompression of nerve structures, placement of a graft or implant, and often plate-and-screw fixation. Outcomes can include reduced arm pain and improved neurologic function, while fusion and adjacent-segment changes may influence longer-term results.
Indications
This procedure may be considered when:
- •Cervical radiculopathy from a herniated disc that may cause arm pain, numbness, or weakness and that can persist despite a span of non-surgical management.
- •Cervical spondylosis with foraminal stenosis that may compress a nerve root and correlate with symptoms and imaging findings.
- •Cervical myelopathy from disc-osteophyte complex or central canal stenosis that can be associated with gait imbalance, hand clumsiness, or hyperreflexia.
- •Progressive neurologic deficit that may be attributable to cervical nerve root or spinal cord compression.
- •Recurrent disc herniation at a previously treated level when revision anterior decompression and stabilization may be considered.
- •Segmental instability or deformity at the affected level(s) where fusion may be used to improve alignment and stability after decompression.
- •Selected traumatic or degenerative disc disruptions where anterior decompression and fusion may be part of a broader stabilization strategy.
How It Works
The procedure typically involves several coordinated steps:
- •Preoperative imaging review (often MRI and/or CT) can be used to correlate symptoms with the target level(s) and to assess stenosis, osteophytes, and alignment.
- •An anterior cervical approach typically uses an intermuscular plane to reach the prevertebral fascia, which can reduce posterior muscle disruption compared with posterior approaches.
- •Fluoroscopic localization can confirm the operative level(s), which may reduce wrong-level surgery risk.
- •A retractor system may be placed to maintain exposure while minimizing pressure on the esophagus, trachea, and neurovascular structures.
- •The disc space is entered and disc material is removed; decompression can include removal of herniated fragments and trimming of uncovertebral or posterior osteophytes.
- •Neural decompression may be confirmed by visualizing the posterior disc space and foraminal regions; the posterior longitudinal ligament may be partially removed in selected cases to improve decompression.
- •Endplate preparation can create a bleeding bony surface that may support fusion biology while attempting to preserve structural integrity to limit implant subsidence.
- •An interbody graft or cage is inserted to restore disc height, which can indirectly enlarge foraminal space and reduce nerve root compression.
- •Bone graft material (autograft, allograft, or biologic adjuncts depending on context) may be used to promote arthrodesis across the disc space.
- •Anterior plate fixation can provide immediate segmental stability and may reduce micromotion that can interfere with fusion, particularly in multi-level constructs.
- •Final imaging can confirm implant position, alignment, and level; neuromonitoring changes, when used, can be reviewed for intraoperative neurologic integrity.
- •Fusion maturation typically spans months as bone forms across the interbody space; clinical improvement may occur earlier due to decompression, while radiographic fusion can develop more gradually.
Risks
As with any surgical procedure, potential risks include:
- •Dysphagia (swallowing difficulty) can occur due to soft-tissue retraction and postoperative swelling; it may be transient but can persist in some cases.
- •Hoarseness or voice change may occur from irritation or injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve; severity can range from mild to clinically significant.
- •Hematoma or airway-compromising neck swelling can occur postoperatively and may require urgent evaluation and intervention due to potential airway obstruction.
- •Infection (superficial or deep) can occur; deep infection may involve hardware and can require prolonged management and possible reoperation.
- •Nonunion (pseudarthrosis) may occur when fusion does not consolidate; it can be associated with persistent pain or hardware stress and may require revision surgery.
- •Adjacent segment degeneration can develop over time at levels above or below the fusion, potentially leading to new symptoms and additional treatment.
- •Nerve root or spinal cord injury can occur, potentially causing new weakness, sensory changes, or myelopathic findings; risk may vary by anatomy and disease severity.
- •Dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leak can occur, particularly in revision surgery or when ossification is present; it can require intraoperative repair and postoperative precautions.
- •Implant-related complications such as graft or cage subsidence, migration, plate/screw loosening, or malposition can occur and may affect alignment or neurologic structures.
- •Vascular or visceral injury (including carotid sheath structures, esophagus, or trachea) can occur rarely and may lead to serious complications requiring specialized management.
Recovery Expectations
Recovery follows a gradual progression:
- •First 24–72 hours: Monitoring typically focuses on airway status, swallowing/voice changes, pain control, and neurologic checks; discharge may occur within this span for uncomplicated cases, while some cases can require a longer hospital span.
- •First 1–2 weeks: Incision healing and soft-tissue swelling often improve; activity is generally limited to light daily tasks, and follow-up may include wound assessment.
- •Weeks 2–6: Gradual increase in walking and basic activities can occur; a cervical collar may be used in some protocols for part of this span depending on surgeon preference and construct factors.
- •Weeks 6–12: Return to desk-based work and light duties may be possible for some individuals depending on symptoms and job demands; physical therapy may be introduced or progressed when appropriate.
- •Months 3–6: Fusion maturation can progress; imaging may be used to assess alignment and early fusion signs; heavier lifting and higher-impact activity can remain restricted in many protocols during this span.
- •Months 6–12: Radiographic fusion can become more evident; residual neck stiffness can persist, and functional recovery may continue to improve across this span.
- •Beyond 12 months: Long-term monitoring may focus on symptom recurrence, adjacent-segment issues, and hardware-related concerns when present.
Alternatives
Depending on individual circumstances, alternatives may include:
- •Non-surgical management such as activity modification, physical therapy, and symptom-directed medications may be used for a span before surgery is considered in many cases.
- •Epidural steroid injection or selective nerve root block may be used in selected radiculopathy cases to reduce inflammation-related pain for a variable span.
- •Posterior cervical foraminotomy may be considered for lateral/foraminal nerve root compression in selected patients and may preserve motion at the treated level.
- •Cervical disc arthroplasty (artificial disc replacement) may be considered for selected single-level or two-level disease to preserve motion, depending on anatomy and contraindications.
- •Posterior cervical decompression procedures (such as laminoplasty or laminectomy with fusion) may be considered for multi-level myelopathy or when posterior pathology predominates.
- •Observation with serial neurologic assessment and imaging may be used in mild or stable cases where symptoms and neurologic findings can be monitored.
Related Pages
- Cervical Disc Herniation(Condition)
- Cervical Radiculopathy(Condition)
- Lumbar Discectomy (Microdiscectomy)(Procedure)